the battery BMS is trying to protect itself from over voltage. your setpoints are too high. read thru your battery manual carefully to see what recomm...

@ouijifour setting 100% at 55.2 will cause problems because you are never getting to the point where the voltage curve is steep enough to be accurate ...

@ouijifour , you want to use the absorb = 56.2 , not 55.2 .... it is important to get EOC high enough to reset BMS to 100% and balance. firmware o...

@ouijifour , if you can get the BMS communicating correctly between battery and inverter, you can use 'lithium' and manage setpoints by % since the ba...

@ouijifour , version= ccaa-190D0E seems to be "fairly good" most of the time. I see a CC/CV charge curve "as programmed" most of the time, but have no...

these settings are working pretty well with 6000xp firmware v 190D0E. Most days I see a correct battery voltage cc-cv curve with end-of-charge at 56.2...

just pinging you @Jared . firmware 190D0E charge control by voltage still showing inconsistent end-of-charge behavior I am NOT HAPPY about what the 60...

@jared , I just read thru all release notes for updates since v3.1... there is nothing written up to address the bug I have experienced with lifepower...

@jared , the issue was not temperature related. The "solar enclosure" was well above 32F. The issue is that 2 of 3 Lifepower4 batteries failed to rest...

@jarrett , it's been more than a month now.... and no work back from EG4 on a firmware patch to address this bug in charge curve ?! I am not impressed...

@jared, I updated firmware to ccaa-190D0E, and have been able to get the system going. However, I am not seeing a correct CC-CV charge curve for LFP u...

system reverted to "bad behavior" for some reason.... floating at charge voltage ?! really, really, really NOT what I want. When can we expect to see ...

@nolensb , wow, that's a big miss on mfg QC ! but, not same problem in my case.....