In the next update, can we get basic voltage logic added to supplement the SOC calculations? The last update did not resolve SOC wander, anecdotally it got a bit worse in my observation as they consistantly wander low now. Within a few weeks, unless I waste grid energy to top them, my 4-pack of wallmounts will end up with 30-40% difference in reported SOC and well below real charge level.
Real life example - I have right now:
Battery 1 - 46% SOC shown
Battery 2 - 34% SOC shown
Battery 3 - 55% SOC shown
Battery 4 - 62% SOC shown
Entire pack is at 52.62V with effectively zero load (solar is just covering loads)
Looking at the EG4 discharge curve, there is no possible way, with any load, to hit that voltage and SOC combination. If the firmware applied basic voltage logic just to limit the SOC wander, while it wouldn't be exactly accurate, it would at least keep them in a reasonable range.
To be clear, topping them weekly does keep them within EG4's stated 10% acceptable wander. But that wastes grid usage or solar production every week every time.
@jamcandles
Are you operating the battery with an approximate 80% DoD during your normal daily cycling?
Summer daily average discharge is 40% total ( 95% to 55% SOC), winter 31% total (95% to ~65% SOC), with solar or grid charging overnight. I have never taken any of them (the current 4-pack, nor my original during my first year) below a 41% total reported pack SOC (and that low only once).
I have automation set to flip everything to grid if the pack drops below 45%.
Individual cell voltage min and max, highest and lowest in the 4-battery pack, is usually 0.003 between the highest and lowest cell at no load, to 0.008 during charging. If I top the batteries, and keep them there (e.g. allow them to remain topped), what I think is the firmware balancing cycle kicks in and cycles repeatedly tops and discharges every few minutes; during those cycles, I have seen 0.02-0.07V differences during those times, but as soon as the pack drops below 100% SOC the differences return to normal.
The battery has has the most wander, the one at 34% in my post, is one of the new batteries, reports 69 cycles total, and is around 8mo old. The batteries at 55 and 62% are the same age, reporting 71 cycles each. While the battery reporting 46% in my post is ~20mo old and reports 181 total cycles.
All are on the latest firmware, RS232 and RS485 were both updated about a month after the last firmware came out.
@eg4eric Sorry I posted my response without hitting reply... and I don't see an edit button to fix it. Details posted at 3:05pm here: https://forum.eg4electronics.com/community/postid/21498/
Correct: Cell delta accross the pack reaches a maximum of 0.08V during balancing cycles; I had the decimal shifted in my prior post.
If you have our EG4 Indoor WallMount batteries, we recommend operating the batteries with an 80% DoD. This helps minimize SOC drift, maintain optimal battery performance, and maximize the overall lifespan of the batteries.
I’m also sharing a document that provides additional information on battery health and the recommended 80% DoD.
Battery-Health-and-DoD-Document.pdf
Thank you @eg4eric. I read and understand he document, however, it feels like the recommendation to regularly use a full 80% DoD (as opposed to 70%, 50%, etc.) is a bit dangerous from both a power-reliability and battery longevity perspective. Let me explain, as I love my batteries and just want to use them to their fullest.
Is there only strict voltage based logic built-in at 80% (or lower) DoD, and then not again until they are topped? I get the voltage changes a lot faster at the high and low levels of discharge; I was mainly wondering (or requesting if its not there) additional logic at the higher, but not quite over-voltage end.
Using my batteries as another example
A consistent, regular full 80% discharge, like the document says, would mean a 1.5-2 day cycle rate for me, and anyone who sized their battery system to cover a couple days of load. We would lose:
I was thinking if there was firmer voltage logic at the higher, but not quite 100% end, it would keep the batteries reported SOC in a fairly-close range, even over extended time periods. It would allow for or add the ability to safely:
Using my battery levels as one last example, that battery thinking it is at 99% is not realistically possible. To pull my batteries down to 53.3 volts at 99% would take an enormous load, well beyond 0.5C, and my dual 12000XP's would trip long before that. Just a little extra voltage based logic would tell the battery that it is, at most, at 95% if there was 0.5C output rate. I suspect just that little bit of knocking the reported SOC back in line would keep the batteries from getting egregiously out of sync over time; they may not be perfect, but they would keep within an acceptable and safe 5-10% of each other.
Currently viewing this topic 1 guest.